An attempt is made at refuting the idea that figurative uses of prepositions are chaotic. Figurative uses of the preposition on are explained as the result of metaphorical mappings from the physical domain onto abstract domains. The semantic structure of this preposition in the source domain is explained as a conceptual schema (support), which is formed as a combination of three more basic image schemas, namely, the contact schema, the control schema, and the force downwards schema. The Invariance Principle guarantees the preservation of the logic of these image schemas in target domains. The selection of a particular target domain is, therefore, motivated
Prepositions are typically polysemous items: they have different, but related senses. According to c...
La définition la plus commune de la préposition sur, y compris chez les linguistes, est qu'elle indi...
The Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS) (Johansson Falck & Okonski, accepted) w...
An attempt is made at refuting the idea that figurative uses of prepositions are chaotic. Figurative...
Prepositions name spatial relationships (e.g., book on a table). But they are also used to convey ab...
The simple relations model pervades most semantic treatments of the topological prepositions in, on ...
A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English preposition ON is presented. It is meant to be both s...
The prepositions in, on and at are usually dealt with in terms of spatiality and are even often labe...
This paper studies the semantic interaction between pairs of closely related prepositions, like in, ...
International audienceThe prepositions in, on and at are usually dealt with in terms of spatiality a...
This article tackles the tricky problem of identifying metaphors in language that includes prepositi...
The purpose of this paper is to apply some recent findings about the meaning of prepositions in Cogn...
The goal of this paper is to propose a novel compositional analysis of literal and metaphoric readin...
My aim is to show that it is, at least at some deep level, pointless to approach the semantics of pr...
Inspired by Strugielska’s (2012) article “Alternate Construals of Source and Target Domains in Conce...
Prepositions are typically polysemous items: they have different, but related senses. According to c...
La définition la plus commune de la préposition sur, y compris chez les linguistes, est qu'elle indi...
The Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS) (Johansson Falck & Okonski, accepted) w...
An attempt is made at refuting the idea that figurative uses of prepositions are chaotic. Figurative...
Prepositions name spatial relationships (e.g., book on a table). But they are also used to convey ab...
The simple relations model pervades most semantic treatments of the topological prepositions in, on ...
A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English preposition ON is presented. It is meant to be both s...
The prepositions in, on and at are usually dealt with in terms of spatiality and are even often labe...
This paper studies the semantic interaction between pairs of closely related prepositions, like in, ...
International audienceThe prepositions in, on and at are usually dealt with in terms of spatiality a...
This article tackles the tricky problem of identifying metaphors in language that includes prepositi...
The purpose of this paper is to apply some recent findings about the meaning of prepositions in Cogn...
The goal of this paper is to propose a novel compositional analysis of literal and metaphoric readin...
My aim is to show that it is, at least at some deep level, pointless to approach the semantics of pr...
Inspired by Strugielska’s (2012) article “Alternate Construals of Source and Target Domains in Conce...
Prepositions are typically polysemous items: they have different, but related senses. According to c...
La définition la plus commune de la préposition sur, y compris chez les linguistes, est qu'elle indi...
The Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS) (Johansson Falck & Okonski, accepted) w...